Sunday, January 31, 2010

Sunday Evening Blogging


The Backyard Project is beginning to take form. And when I say 'take form' I mean I've written a plan out on paper. Sharpie + graph paper FTW! The plan consists of judiciously trimming trees, mercilessly destroying weeds, and prudently laying new sod. Our once lush backyard has become overgrown and terribly under utilized in recent months. This is due, in no small part mind you, to a lack of both sunlight and water. The trees block the sunlight (hence need to be trimmed) and my lazy butt doesn't hand water nearly enough.

Thus being of full mind and body I hereby swear that I am going to recant my lazy ways and water my backyard once it's been completely replaced. Not being one to ignore the relentless advance of lawn technology, I am also going to have a new sprinkler system installed. Thereby channeling my energies from dragging hoses around the yard to the press of a button. Maybe I'll even setup a timer? Since this site is presumably about projects of a digital nature, maybe I'll build a timer for the sprinkler system. That would be interesting...


Monday, January 25, 2010

Excitement, thy name is 'Mass Effect 2'

After playing through the original Mass Effect a couple times on the XBox, I've become very excited about the release of its sequel. The boys at IGN fawn all over this game which doesn't help tame my gaming lust.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Sunday Evening Blogging


Due to my utter ineptitude regarding taking care of anything that is plant-like, I am in need of replacing the grass behind my house. After speaking with several lawn-replacement professionals over the weekend, I've come to conclusion that:
  1. This is going to be expensive
  2. Sprinkler systems are the way to go in South Texas
  3. Sprinkler systems are expensive
Replacing just the backyard will probably run around $3,000 to $4,000. That estimate is probably high, I'll know more when I get quotes. Morel of the story... houses are fraking expensive.

I've been working on Part Duex of the Measuring Reality post. Frankly, I am having difficulty wrapping my head around the math of wave function mechanics. I'll get it sooner or later and since no one reads this blog I've got all the time in the world.

Saints vs. Colts Superbowl! Poor Favre, I guess he'll have to console himself with his millions of dollars. I'm sure hope he'll take a dip in it ala Scrooge McDuck.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Recommended Reading


Jennifer Ouellette wrote a fantastic book a few years ago entitled "Black Bodies and Quantum Cats". The book has been on my "To Read" list for a little while now but until Amazon Prime significantly lowered my barrier for purchasing books, I never got around to buying and reading it.

After speeding through the first half of the book, I have to say that I missed out by not getting the book earlier. It's a great read about pioneers in physics. It's not just the "Famous Guys" of physics either but a smattering of folks around the world interested in natural philosophy, engineering and mathematics. The book can feel a little broken up at times but the overall writing style is clear and easy to understand. Jennifer has a real gift and I can't wait for her next book about the calculus. I can't wait! :)


Sunday, January 17, 2010

Measuring Reality

Like many folks, I'm sure you've heard of Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in popular culture. It essentially states that you cannot know the position and momentum of a quantum particle at the same time. This is probably the most widely known principle in quantum physics and the least understood at the same time.

It's understandable that people get the concept mixed up and infuse poor reasoning and strange theology into it because, frankly, the very concept of uncertainty is confusing and seems to cross the border from physics into philosophy. It arrises in quantum physics due to a wave / particle duality of the microscopic world.

The popular model of an atom looks like a miniature solar system with a tough nut of a nucleus at the center and electrons in various energetic states orbiting around it. Physicists know this model is complete bunk in terms of modeling how atoms are put together physically but it's great for mathematically explaining how they function. (Physicists are freaks for building models, most of them are abstract and represented in computers nowadays.)

Instead physicists describe physical systems (such as an atom) using what's called a wavefunction. Before discussing wave functions, a quick reminder of the properties of a wave are in order.

Let's look at a typical example of a wave (drawn with amazing detail with my favorite writing utensil, the Sharpie):



This is an example of a simple wave generated with the cosine function. Wavelength is the length between each peak (or valley) of the wave, amplitude is the measure of how large the wave is at it's peaks and frequency defines how many peaks pass a given point within a period length of time. Generally, wave functions are described using a two dimensional graph in which the Y axis represents probability and the X axis represents position.

So, lets say this wave represents a unit of matter. This unit of matter could be anything from an electron to a molecule or even a snowball. In the example above, the wave repeats an pattern with certain frequency, amplitude, and wavelength. If we over lay this wave on to a two dimensional wave distribution graph described above, several observations are able to made.

First, each point in which the amplitude (Y-axis) is at it's maximum would represent a higher probability an object would be found in a particular position (X-axis). Also, longer wavelengths directly correspond to longer positions in the same amount of time so we can infer that wavelength is a measure of momentum.

Now, imagine attempting to define a single point on this wave where the unit of matter exists. An obvious solution would be at the peaks. If that's the case, which peak do we define as the position of our unit of matter? There is an infinite number of them (remember, the wave is continuous).

Ack! Getting long and I need to go draw more graphs, therefore:

To be continued…

The Resemblance is Uncanny






My new issue of the Linux Journal came a couple of days ago and the kid on the front cover bears an uncanny resemblance to my son, Alex. I chose the picture of Alex chewing on his football because I find it funny.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

TV on the Internet?


I've been attempting to get Boxee working correctly with an old AMD Athalon XP 2100 w/ a Geforce 400-MX (ancient!) and haven't had much success. I've tried both Windows XP and Ubuntu 9.04 and found the Linux version to be much more stable and usable. Even though Flash 10 is quicker on Windows, the Boxee interface and video playback is much less buggy on Ubuntu.

Honestly, just attaching the computer to our TV and mousing to hulu.com, nbc.com, and abc.com has been easier and faster than trying to use Boxee. Simple, yet effective.

Friday, January 8, 2010

Superposition

Recently, I've been reading Chad Orzel's book "How To Teach Physics To Your Dog" and browsing around the internets in an attempt to gain a better understanding of modern physics, specifically quantum mechanics. I decided to write a few blog posts about my adventures in QM to provide myself study direction.

It's difficult to convey just how unbelievably weird quantum mechanics is. Interactions of the elementry particles of reality are difficult to grasp with a classical understanding of physics.

For example, when throwing a snowball at your neighbor for stealing the day's paper (once again) you expect said snowball to rise at the angle and velocity your hand and arm put it in. You also expect the snowball to begin arcing downward according to Earth's gravitational pull (9.8 m/s^2) and finish it's flight in his face.

You do not expect, however, the snowball to be in a superposition state during the flight and only suffer a small chance of smashing into your neighbor's face. Instead, you feel you know the flight and subsequent termination of the snowball's trajectory because you've dealt with classical physical phenomena all your life.

Personally, I find superposition to be an insanely cool sounding term. Unfortunately, the concept is outside of our "normal" physical understanding and can be difficult to grasp. What makes it so different from everyday life? Unlike the simple model of an atom usually imagined as a tiny solar system, electrons don't orbit around a nucleus like planets around a star. Generally, when folks in the know refer to electrons in an atom, they are imaging something similar to a cloud of potential electron states surrounding the atom's nucleus.

You may say, "Wait a minute, what does state mean?" A particle's state refers to it's position and energy level (momentum) around a nucleus. So when you say an electron exists in all states at once, you're essentially saying that it's at all energy levels and positions around the nucleus at once. This is very counterintuitive especially considering we don't see a haze of Jupiter's, Saturn's or Neptune's when we look up into the night sky.

So, let's look at hydrogen as an example. We know that the hydrogen atom has one electron. The electron cloud surrounding hydrogen's nucleus is made up of (usually) one electron in a superposition state. That is to say, the electron exists in all possible states at once. Very strange, eh? To describe the position of the electron isn't too difficult and describing the energy level (momentum) of the electron isn't too difficult either. However, woe is the person who attempts to find both at once.

Finding both position and momentum of a particle in superposition is impossible due to constraints of not our quantum mathematical model, but reality itself. I'll explain why in my next post.

Most of the information in this post was gathered from Dr. Orzel's book and Wikipedia.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

There Be Dragons Here...


A dragon crawled up on my desk this afternoon while I was working on a post about wave / particle duality. Before it ate my volt meter, Jenni slayed it with her mad balsa wood sword skillz.